|
|
The board of directors of a nonprofit organization has a
responsibility to safeguard the organization's assets, and to
ensure that funds are used to further the organization's goals. In
addition, the board must ensure that donor designations are
honored, and that cash and other investments are managed
wisely.
Specifically, the board should review three areas related to
investments:
- Cash Management
- Cash management refers to ordinary transfers, usually of
small amounts, between the checking account and other liquid
accounts such as savings accounts. For example, if an
organization anticipates having excess cash for a few months,
the organization may open an account that earns more interest
and temporarily hold cash there. (See Financial Management FAQ
16: How Should We Invest Our Short-Term Cash
Balances?)
While these tasks are typically managed by staff, the board has
a responsibility to oversee cash management and periodically
review staff work. In most boards, the finance committee meets
periodically with finance staff to review cash management
guidelines and practices.
- Endowment Funds (now called permanently restricted
net assets)
- Endowment funds, also called permanently restricted net
assets, are created when donors designate contributions to a
fund where the principal amount of the gift (the amount of the
contribution) will not be spent, but will be maintained in
perpetuity, for the purpose of producing income for the
organization. In a term endowment fund the donor has specified
that, after a stipulated passage of time or after the
occurrence of some event, the principal amount may be spent as
well. Most endowment funds specify that the principal will be
held in perpetuity, but that earnings on the principal may be
used for the organization's operating expenses.
The board's key responsibilities with endowment funds are to
ensure that the principal is maintained and that the endowment
is invested wisely. Assets held in the endowment fund (cash,
stocks, bonds, land, works of art, etc.) should be managed
prudently, according to guidelines which the organization has
adopted for management of the funds. When organizations need
cash, either because of an ongoing deficit or short-term cash
deficits, they are tempted to borrow from endowment funds. Any
such loans from the endowment fund should be approved by a
formal vote of the board and a repayment schedule should be
established. Because such loans put the principal of the
endowment fund at risk, they should be discouraged.
It is the responsibility of the board to establish guidelines
for the management of the endowment fund. These guidelines are
typically discussed by the finance committee, which makes
recommendations on policy to the board. Some of the most
important guidelines to establish are the following:
- Shall the principal be maintained at face value or
should the endowment be managed so that the value of the
endowment increases at the rate of inflation?
For example, if an organization has an endowment fund valued
at $2 million and the earnings are used for current
purposes, over time the endowment funds purchasing power
will be reduced, although it will still show on the books at
$2 million. Some organizations choose to reinvest an amount
of the earnings equal to inflation in the endowment fund, in
essence defining maintaining the principal as the principal
adjusted for inflation.
This is sometimes achieved by adopting a spending rule. For
example, some organizations assume long term inflation at
four percent and average portfolio return at nine percent,
and thereby adopt a rule to spend five percent of the
average market value of the endowment over the next three
years.
- Shall gains on contributed, non-cash assets be treated
as additions to principal (and, therefore, to be held in
perpetuity), or as income (and, therefore, available for
current expenditure)?
For example, imagine an organization that receives a
contribution of ten shares of stock, valued at $1,000 each
for a total of $10,000. A year later, the organization sells
the stock, now valued at $1,100 a share, for a total of
$11,000. Must the organization now keep $11,000 in
perpetuity, or can it keep $10,000 in the principal, and
take $1,000 into income for current purposes? (In some cases
a donor may place restrictions on the contributed assets
such as specifying that a donation of stock cannot be
sold.)
- How often will we withdraw the cash resulting from
interest income from the portfolio and into the checking
account of the general operating fund?
Some organizations choose to take the earnings from the
principal out of the investment accounts only once a year.
Others pull out the earnings quarterly, or even monthly. Of
course, the longer the intervals between withdrawals, the
more income will be realized (because the income will be
earning interest, too, until it is withdrawn).
- Maximizing Income Through Prudent Investment
- Whether assets belong in an organization's general fund,
its endowment fund, or other fund, these assets should be
invested wisely. Key decisions the board should make related to
investments are:
- Should we hire a portfolio manager or investment
advisor, or make our investment decisions?
Organizations with substantial assets often hire a portfolio
manager. Organizations with fewer dollars to invest usually
rely on the expertise of a board member or the finance
committee.
The portfolio manager, typically employed at a bank,
brokerage, or an investment advisory firm, is responsible
for making in vestment decisions for the organization. The
portfolio manager will meet with the finance or investment
committee to learn about the organization 's financial
objectives and other concerns, and then make investment
decisions throughout the year to meet those objectives. The
portfolio manager should give the organization a monthly or
quarterly written report which shows all the trades made in
the period, the investments at the end of the period, and
the value of each investment.
Portfolio managers and investment advisors are generally
paid on a retainer basis (a flat monthly fee) for their
services, although some are paid as a percentage of the
portfolio and others by commission on trades (the latter
creates an incentive to make frequent transactions). Great
care should be taken in selecting a portfolio manager and
the finance or investment committee should routinely review
the manager's performance in detail (usually by making
comparisons to the returns in the financial markets and the
returns on mutual funds which have similar investment
objectives as the organization), just as they should when
working with other professionals such as auditors and
attorneys.
Some organizations that have identified and agreed on an
investment strategy choose to invest directly in a mutual
fund that with similar investment objectives, rather than
hire a portfolio manager.
- Should we create an investments committee?
Organizations with little investment activity often choose
to have their finance committees oversee investments. Some
organizations with substantial investments choose to create
a second committee to oversee investments. One common
arrangement is for the investments committee to be chaired
by an experienced member of the finance committee, and to
include both other board members as well as non-board
members, with board members comprising a majority of the
investment committee. Having non-board members on the
committee allows the organization to use the expertise and
perspectives of individuals who may not have the time or
other qualifications to be members of the board.
In some cases, the investments committee or the finance
committee makes specific investment decisions themselves,
such as to move funds from Treasury bonds into mutual funds,
to sell a particular stock, etc. In other cases, the
committee selects and meets regularly with the portfolio
manager to review investment decisions, and if necessary,
recommends changing to a new manager.
- What guidelines should we establish for the investments
committee or for the portfolio manager?
The following questions are examples of concerns that boards
take up in investment management. Often these questions are
discussed primarily in the investments and/or finance
committee, where committee members are more likely to be
familiar with financial terms and the implications of
financial decisions. In some organizations these questions
are left to the investments or finance committee, while in
other organizations proposed guidelines are brought to the
whole board for approval. The answers to these questions
will change over time as the organization's needs change;
the appropriate committee must be in touch with board
concerns, as well as with the following questions.
- Is our primary objective short-term earnings or long
term equity growth?
An investment that provides higher returns may not grow as
much in equity. For example, a stock with relatively high
dividend income may not increase significantly in its par
value. Conversely, a piece of real estate may not provide
much rental income, but over time may increase greatly in
value and could be sold at great profit. Organizations with
large portfolios will want a diverse portfolio that balances
investment types; other organizations may choose different
objectives as their program plans and cash needs change.
- What level of risk is acceptable to our
organization?
In general, the higher the expected return on an investment,
the higher risk of losing the principal. Some organizations
may feel comfortable only with investments that are
virtually risk-free (despite low returns), such as savings
accounts within FDIC-insured limits or U.S. Treasury bills
and notes. Such low-risk investments typically are expected
to earn less than higher risk investments such as stocks or
money market funds. But if the company or the money market
funds goes bankrupt, the organization may lose its
investment entirely.
- Should we establish any non-financial guidelines for
investments?
Some organizations specify a preference for stocks in
locally owned companies; one drug/alcohol abuse organization
specified that no investments be made in companies that
manufacture alcoholic beverages. Socially responsible
investing is an example of utilizing non-financial
guidelines.
- How quickly must our investments be convertible to
cash?
For example, do we want a certain percentage of funds
liquid, that is, convertible to cash within, for example,
five days?
These guidelines only touch on the important and often complex
questions that boards must address in effectively managing
investments. Most boards delegate their responsibilities to the
finance committee in both oversight of staff work and setting
financial guidelines. The finance committee typically brings major
policies to the board for approval, and makes annual or quarterly
written reports to the board on how cash and investments are being
held, and on earnings performance during the previous period.
Return to the List of FAQs
|
 |
|
|
|